Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 7, 2017 at 6:37 vote accept Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo
Nov 28, 2017 at 14:48 answer added John Donne timeline score: 0
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:39 comment added Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo Still, I have the feeling that using that identity is too much work. I would have to prove it, together with the fact that $\textbf{L} \times \textbf{L}=i \hbar \textbf{L}$. This seems more work than simply proving $\textbf{r}(\textbf{L} \cdot\textbf{p})-\textbf{p}(\textbf{L} \cdot\textbf{r})=0$ by hand. I was hoping there was some kind of neat trick here.
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:33 comment added Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo $\textbf{L} \times \textbf{L}=i \hbar \textbf{L}$ is not zero. And Req is not equal to that, it is missing a commutator. $ a × (b × c) = b (a \cdot c) − (a \cdot b) c + [ a_j , b ] c_j$
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:19 comment added M111 If you subtract the two terms you get $Req + (L.r)p - (L.p)r = 0$. Where Req is the quantity you have to show to be equal to zero. The remaining part can be expressed as $L \times (r \times p)$ which is zero, since $L = r \times p$. I think this process is fine.
Nov 26, 2017 at 20:40 review First posts
Nov 26, 2017 at 22:22
Nov 26, 2017 at 20:35 history asked Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo CC BY-SA 3.0