Timeline for Quantum Vector Operators. Showing $\textbf{r}(\textbf{L} \cdot\textbf{p})-\textbf{p}(\textbf{L} \cdot\textbf{r})=0$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 7, 2017 at 6:37 | vote | accept | Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo | ||
Nov 28, 2017 at 14:48 | answer | added | John Donne | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:39 | comment | added | Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo | Still, I have the feeling that using that identity is too much work. I would have to prove it, together with the fact that $\textbf{L} \times \textbf{L}=i \hbar \textbf{L}$. This seems more work than simply proving $\textbf{r}(\textbf{L} \cdot\textbf{p})-\textbf{p}(\textbf{L} \cdot\textbf{r})=0$ by hand. I was hoping there was some kind of neat trick here. | |
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:33 | comment | added | Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo | $\textbf{L} \times \textbf{L}=i \hbar \textbf{L}$ is not zero. And Req is not equal to that, it is missing a commutator. $ a × (b × c) = b (a \cdot c) − (a \cdot b) c + [ a_j , b ] c_j$ | |
Nov 26, 2017 at 21:19 | comment | added | M111 | If you subtract the two terms you get $Req + (L.r)p - (L.p)r = 0$. Where Req is the quantity you have to show to be equal to zero. The remaining part can be expressed as $L \times (r \times p)$ which is zero, since $L = r \times p$. I think this process is fine. | |
Nov 26, 2017 at 20:40 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 26, 2017 at 22:22 | |||||
Nov 26, 2017 at 20:35 | history | asked | Saúl Pilatowsky-Cameo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |