Timeline for Validation of Work-Energy Theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2017 at 15:30 | comment | added | A Slow Learner | @You are correct... I should have read more carefully. See edit. | |
| Oct 19, 2017 at 15:29 | history | edited | A Slow Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 140 characters in body
|
| Oct 19, 2017 at 15:17 | comment | added | JMac | But his statement was "if we apply work energy theorem from his initial position to final position (Change in Kinetic Energy would be 0)". You said "this is incorrect"; but it is not. You took the line completely out of context and then said it made him wrong... | |
| Oct 19, 2017 at 15:16 | comment | added | A Slow Learner | @JMac That's why I said "before he has hit the water". | |
| Oct 19, 2017 at 15:14 | comment | added | JMac | If the man starts at $0 \frac m s$ and ends at $0 \frac m s$ the net change in kinetic energy of the man over that time frame is definitely $0$. | |
| Oct 19, 2017 at 15:06 | history | answered | A Slow Learner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |