Timeline for Virtual photon description of $B$ and $E$ fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2011 at 15:11 | history | edited | QGR | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 24, 2011 at 15:22 | comment | added | Nigel Seel | Thanks for the series of clarificatory thoughts you're adding to this answer. "And if a photon is detected in any way, it definitely has to be a virtual photon" because the act of detection is itself the "external leg", is that correct? | |
| Jan 24, 2011 at 15:06 | history | edited | QGR | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 557 characters in body
|
| Jan 23, 2011 at 9:09 | history | edited | QGR | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 806 characters in body
|
| Jan 22, 2011 at 14:49 | comment | added | Nigel Seel | I think there are elements to an answer to my question here. Could you link your thoughts above to the specific differences between a static magnetic and static electric field? It's not clear to me how virtual photon polarisation could implement the distinction. | |
| Jan 22, 2011 at 10:38 | history | edited | QGR | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 174 characters in body
|
| Jan 22, 2011 at 10:29 | history | answered | QGR | CC BY-SA 2.5 |