Skip to main content
added 745 characters in body
Source Link
sammy gerbil
  • 27.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 72

No, the normal force is not distributed uniformly across the contact area. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

The weight of the book is distributed uniformly because its mass is distributed uniformly, but there is no reason why normal reaction should be distributed uniformly also. As your calculation showsThis is because the book is a rigid body, not a uniform distributioncollection of identical disconnected masses. For disconnected masses, the normal reaction on each would equal the weight of each, which is not compatible with the conditions for equilibriumsame. But there would be no force to support the part of book which overhangs the table. A rigid body redistributes forces internally, so that the part overhanging the table is supported by the part on the table.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force, a response to other forces or contraints. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium, or a defined state of motion. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces. It increases towards the edge of the table.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine the normal force at each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of possible distributions of the normal reaction force which are compatible with the 2 conditions for equilibrium.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or stretched or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus $E$, Shear Modulus $G$ and bulk modulus $K$. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of vertical springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example. If the surfaces are not smooth then lateral friction forces could be modelled with horizontal springs, possibly having a different spring constant.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply. The book or table could be warped so that the normal force varies unevenly.

No, the normal force is not distributed uniformly across the contact area. The weight of the book is distributed uniformly because its mass is distributed uniformly, but there is no reason why normal reaction should be distributed uniformly. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force, a response to other forces or contraints. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces. It increases towards the edge of the table.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply. The book or table could be warped so that the normal force varies unevenly.

No, the normal force is not distributed uniformly across the contact area. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

The weight of the book is distributed uniformly because its mass is distributed uniformly, but there is no reason why normal reaction should be distributed uniformly also. This is because the book is a rigid body, not a collection of identical disconnected masses. For disconnected masses, the normal reaction on each would equal the weight of each, which is the same. But there would be no force to support the part of book which overhangs the table. A rigid body redistributes forces internally, so that the part overhanging the table is supported by the part on the table.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force, a response to other forces or contraints. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium, or a defined state of motion. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces. It increases towards the edge of the table.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine the normal force at each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of possible distributions of the normal reaction force which are compatible with the 2 conditions for equilibrium.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or stretched or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described by Young's Modulus $E$, Shear Modulus $G$ and bulk modulus $K$. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of vertical springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example. If the surfaces are not smooth then lateral friction forces could be modelled with horizontal springs, possibly having a different spring constant.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply. The book or table could be warped so that the normal force varies unevenly.

added 293 characters in body
Source Link
sammy gerbil
  • 27.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 72

No, the normal force is not uniformly distributed alonguniformly across the contact area. ThereThe weight of the book is distributed uniformly because its mass is distributed uniformly, but there is no reason why itnormal reaction should be distributed uniformly. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force, a response to other forces or contraints. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces. It increases towards the edge of the table.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply. The book or table could be warped so that the normal force varies unevenly.

No, the normal force is not uniformly distributed along the contact area. There is no reason why it should be. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply.

No, the normal force is not distributed uniformly across the contact area. The weight of the book is distributed uniformly because its mass is distributed uniformly, but there is no reason why normal reaction should be distributed uniformly. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force, a response to other forces or contraints. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces. It increases towards the edge of the table.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply. The book or table could be warped so that the normal force varies unevenly.

added 71 characters in body
Source Link
sammy gerbil
  • 27.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 72

No, the normal force is not uniformly distributed along the contact area. There is no reason why it should be. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply.

No, the normal force is not uniformly distributed along the contact area. There is no reason why it should be. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

No, the normal force is not uniformly distributed along the contact area. There is no reason why it should be. As your calculation shows, a uniform distribution is not compatible with the conditions for equilibrium.

Like static friction the normal force is a reaction force. Wherever possible it adjusts to take whatever value is needed to keep the system in equilibrium. This includes the equilibrium of torques as well as forces.

It is not possible to determine how the normal force is distributed if the book and table remain perfectly rigid and flat. The problem is statically indeterminate. See for example A simple (?) problem of static equilibrium.

If the book makes contact at only two points then we could solve the two conditions for equilibrium (zero net force, zero net torque) to determine each. If the book makes contact at 3 or more points we cannot find the distribution of reaction forces between these points, because we do not have enough equations of constraint. If contact is made over a finite area, there are an infinite number of contact points, and therefore an infinite number of distributions of the normal reaction force.

Real books and tables are elastic to some extent and deform on small scales - they are compressed or bent. The amount of deformation is related to the applied forces and torques and the material properties described eg by Young's Modulus. When these extra equations describing the material properties are taken into account, the problem is no longer indeterminate.

One possible assumption is that the contact between the book and table can be modelled as a row of springs obeying Hooke' Law between two perfect planes. The normal force must therefore increase linearly from one end of the contact surface to the other. See Estimate the reaction force on each leg of a 4-legged table for a similar example.

However, this is only an assumption. It does not necessarily apply.

Source Link
sammy gerbil
  • 27.5k
  • 6
  • 35
  • 72
Loading