Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by kg__
Bounty Ended with Void's answer chosen by kg__
added 17 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Void
  • 20.7k
  • 1
  • 37
  • 84

Spin angular momentum query Why does both the electron and the antineutrino have spin only $+1/2$ in the Wu experiment?

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ ${\rm Co}\rightarrow {\rm Ni}^* + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$, the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$$e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$$e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_z$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

Spin angular momentum query

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_z$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

Why does both the electron and the antineutrino have spin only $+1/2$ in the Wu experiment?

In ${\rm Co}\rightarrow {\rm Ni}^* + e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$, the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{\nu}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_z$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

edited body
Source Link
kg__
  • 189
  • 1
  • 13

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_x$$S_z$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_x$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_z$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/901788760576327680
added 27 characters in body
Source Link
kg__
  • 189
  • 1
  • 13

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_x$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

In $Co\rightarrow Ni^* + e^- + \bar{v}_e$ , the Wu experiment, it is said that $J_{co}$ = 5, $J_{Ni}$ = 4 and hence J of "$e^- + \bar{v}_e$" system is 1. If orbital angular momentum is zero, its S=J=1. Because of this we say both electron and anti-neutrino has $S_z$=1/2. But I guess, if S=1, $S_z$ of this total system($e^- + \bar{v}_e$) can also be 1,0 or -1. This leads to $S_z$ of electron and neutrino to have values $S_z$=0,1/2 or -1/2. Then, why do we take only $S_x$ = +1/2 for both electron and anti-neutrino?

Notice added Draw attention by kg__
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by kg__
edited tags
Link
kg__
  • 189
  • 1
  • 13
Loading
Source Link
kg__
  • 189
  • 1
  • 13
Loading