Timeline for Variation of angle of minimum deviation with prism angle
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2017 at 13:18 | comment | added | Mitchell | graphsketch.com/… | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 13:16 | history | edited | Mitchell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 111 characters in body
|
| Aug 15, 2017 at 13:13 | comment | added | Mitchell | If you have set a particular value of the refractive index, you will have to use the second equation, expanding the sine function and from up a relation between Dmin and A. I'm afraid, i am not familiar with the graph that we will get. But the equation will be as above. Use a graph sketch online, | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 12:51 | comment | added | Darkheart | Yeah i realise i doesn't change with Dmin. But the i which causes the Dmin will change with A, for example let's say Dmin for prism angle 60°, is 20°, here i would be 40°; now in a separate prism of same refractive index but prism angle about 30°, and Dmin 10°, i would be 20°. So i and Dmin are fixed for a value of A. What i want to know is the variation of Dmin with A, and the shape of the graph. And in this case let's assume refractive index is 1.5 for the prism. | |
| Aug 14, 2017 at 16:08 | history | edited | Mitchell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 180 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2017 at 15:41 | history | edited | Mitchell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 546 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2017 at 15:31 | comment | added | Darkheart | I have elaborated on my question. I think I wasn't clear enough before. My apologies. | |
| Aug 14, 2017 at 15:25 | history | answered | Mitchell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |