Timeline for What is the implication of using the Lagrangian to find the equation of motion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Aug 14, 2017 at 13:31 | history | suggested | user163104 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Altered title to reflect question. (Sorry if this is deemed minor, but to me the original title was too vague)
|
Aug 14, 2017 at 13:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 14, 2017 at 13:31 | |||||
Aug 14, 2017 at 12:57 | answer | added | ZeroTheHero | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 14, 2017 at 8:36 | answer | added | Mikael Fremling | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 14, 2017 at 8:26 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Your first subquestion (v3) seems to make no sense: If we know nothing about the force, we would know nothing about the potential energy as well, or if it even exists. | |
Aug 14, 2017 at 8:22 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Aug 14, 2017 at 8:11 | review | First posts | |||
Aug 14, 2017 at 8:32 | |||||
Aug 14, 2017 at 8:07 | history | asked | sid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |