Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 13, 2017 at 10:17 comment added Tim Not every field theory can be described by a Lagrangian. This was discovered only very recently. See, for example, the slides to this excellent talk indico.ipmu.jp/indico/event/134/contribution/17/material/slides/…. Moreover, what is known for a long time now is "that not all dynamical systems are amenable to a Lagrangian formulation" users.ox.ac.uk/~mert2255/papers/symmetries.pdf
Aug 31, 2012 at 10:13 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
added the word 'quantization'
Jun 5, 2012 at 9:18 comment added Turion Vladimir, Carl, I think what Vladimir wrote is what physicist don't do anymore (at least in fairly fundamental physics) and shouldn't do. An equation falls from the sky as least as arbitrarily as a Lagrangian density. And equations are not that easily quantised, but alas, the world seems to be quantum, so we want to jump to quantum theories as fast as possible. (Of course, if we are doing completely classical stuff such as environmental physics, we might me happy with just equations.)
Jan 21, 2011 at 23:40 comment added Carl Brannen Vladimir, I think what your wrote is what physicists SHOULD do, but in actual fact they write down Lagrangians based on observed symmetries from experiments. Mathematically, the typically used method is glorified curve fitting.
Jan 21, 2011 at 21:48 comment added Vladimir Kalitvianski Actually, physicists advance first physical equations, and then, if possible, write the corresponding Lagrangian. Doing in the opposite direction is funny but does not guarantees equations describing some physics. Moreover, the equations obtained for the principle of least action may have unphysical solutions.
Jan 21, 2011 at 16:55 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/28495996606488576
Jan 21, 2011 at 16:48 answer added Kostya timeline score: 3
Jan 21, 2011 at 16:33 answer added Gerben timeline score: 3
Jan 21, 2011 at 16:08 answer added user566 timeline score: 52
Jan 21, 2011 at 15:47 history asked user1355 CC BY-SA 2.5