Skip to main content

Why does acceleration due resulting force dependdepends on mass andwhile acceleration due gravity notdoesn't?

Objects intrinsically resist to be accelerated due its massto their masses. A clear example would be kicking a soccer ball vs kicking a bowling ball. LastThe latter ball will resist much more to be accelerated than the first one due to its greater mass (intrinsic property).

What if we positionateposition them in a inertial frame of reference in space? If we push both previous balls with the same force we will obtain different accelerations due to the balls' different masses, isn't it?

Why acceleration due resulting force depend on mass and acceleration due gravity not?

Objects intrinsically resist to be accelerated due its mass. A clear example would be kicking a soccer ball vs kicking a bowling ball. Last ball will resist much more to be accelerated than first one due its greater mass (intrinsic property).

What if we positionate in a inertial frame of reference in space? If we push both previous balls with the same force we will obtain different accelerations due balls' masses isn't it?

Why does acceleration due resulting force depends on mass while acceleration due gravity doesn't?

Objects intrinsically resist to be accelerated due to their masses. A clear example would be kicking a soccer ball vs kicking a bowling ball. The latter ball will resist much more to be accelerated than the first one due to its greater mass (intrinsic property).

What if we position them in a inertial frame of reference in space? If we push both previous balls with the same force we will obtain different accelerations due to the balls' different masses, isn't it?

Question Protected by Qmechanic
added 361 characters in body
Source Link
JD_PM
  • 777
  • 1
  • 8
  • 28

I know it is a basic question but I would likeObjects intrinsically resist to havebe accelerated due its mass. A clear example would be kicking a strong argumentsoccer ball vs kicking a bowling ball. Last ball will resist much more to be accelerated than first one due its greater mass (intrinsic property).

What if we positionate in a inertial frame of reference in space? If we push both previous balls with the same force we will obtain different accelerations due balls' masses isn't it?

I know it is a basic question but I would like to have a strong argument.

Objects intrinsically resist to be accelerated due its mass. A clear example would be kicking a soccer ball vs kicking a bowling ball. Last ball will resist much more to be accelerated than first one due its greater mass (intrinsic property).

What if we positionate in a inertial frame of reference in space? If we push both previous balls with the same force we will obtain different accelerations due balls' masses isn't it?

deleted 8 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

I know it is a basic question but I would like to have a strong argument.

Thank you

I know it is a basic question but I would like to have a strong argument.

Thank you

I know it is a basic question but I would like to have a strong argument.

Post Undeleted by JD_PM
Post Deleted by JD_PM
Source Link
JD_PM
  • 777
  • 1
  • 8
  • 28
Loading