Timeline for Anti-matter black holes radiation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2017 at 11:24 | vote | accept | robsosno | ||
| Jul 30, 2017 at 11:22 | comment | added | robsosno | Thank you for all your explanatory answers. I understand them. It is just very counterintuitive to allow things like this: p- + e+ --> black hole --> p+ + e- | |
| Jul 30, 2017 at 1:21 | comment | added | user4552 | This means that in the (very) long term we will have more anti-matter in the Universe than now. You may want to look at physics.stackexchange.com/questions/74041/… . Black hole evaporation is actually not a big contributor to the state of the universe in the very distant future. | |
| Jul 29, 2017 at 19:21 | comment | added | robsosno | One more thought: so regardless if we had matter or anti-matter at the beginning we have at the end equal amount of matter and anti-matter assuming equal probabilities. This means that in the (very) long term we will have more anti-matter in the Universe than now. | |
| Jul 29, 2017 at 19:10 | comment | added | robsosno | Ok, so the end result can be all of this: anti-matter, plain matter, and most probably photons. And we don't have any way to infer if black hole was created from matter or anti-matter. Sounds reasonable. | |
| Jul 29, 2017 at 16:57 | history | answered | user4552 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |