Timeline for What is the universal definition of the order parameter that is valid irrespective of the nature of the phase transition?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2017 at 9:38 | answer | added | SRS | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 29, 2017 at 3:11 | history | edited | SRS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 98 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jul 29, 2017 at 1:56 | history | edited | valerio | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2017 at 23:07 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 28, 2017 at 23:28 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2017 at 23:06 | comment | added | sammy gerbil | Possibly related to Why can't the density difference between the liquid and solid be an appropriate order parameter for liquid-to-solid transition? | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 22:55 | history | edited | SRS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 28, 2017 at 22:52 | history | edited | SRS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 28, 2017 at 22:50 | comment | added | SRS | @sammygerbil Any definition that I've heard of has the same problem | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 22:48 | comment | added | sammy gerbil | -1. Unclear. This is not a definition. It is only a description of one possible range of values. | |
| Jul 28, 2017 at 18:14 | history | asked | SRS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |