Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by ACuriousMind
added 3 characters in body
Source Link

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {{\rm ln} \,3} {48 \, \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26$\alpha > 1/137.26$ - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036$1/137.036$. Is Hod's argument correct?

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {{\rm ln} \,3} {48 \, \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {{\rm ln} \,3} {48 \, \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that $\alpha > 1/137.26$ - which is very close to the real value $1/137.036$. Is Hod's argument correct?

better math typesetting
Source Link

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {ln(\,3\,)} {48 \pi}$$$$\alpha > \frac {{\rm ln} \,3} {48 \, \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {ln(\,3\,)} {48 \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {{\rm ln} \,3} {48 \, \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

added 53 characters in body
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.9k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

Another limit on the fine structure consantconstant - based on a formula by Lubos Motl

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant"PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {ln(\,3\,)} {48 \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

Another limit on the fine structure consant - based on a formula by Lubos Motl

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {ln(\,3\,)} {48 \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

Another limit on the fine structure constant - based on a formula by Lubos Motl

This paper by Hod entitled "Gravitation, thermodynamics and the fine-structure constant" (PDF) starts from a formula on black hole resonance frequencies. If you follow the references through, Lubos Motl has also derived this formula in L. Motl, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6, 1135 (2003). Now Hod claims that the formula and the third principle of thermodynamics, taken together, imply that

$$\alpha > \frac {ln(\,3\,)} {48 \pi}$$

This is a very good limit, because it means that alpha > 1/137.26 - which is very close to the real value 1/137.036. Is Hod's argument correct?

Mathjax instead of text
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading