Timeline for How to determine mobile robot's required torque for accelerating uphill?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2017 at 16:59 | history | edited | ERK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2017 at 15:53 | comment | added | ERK | Regardless of what method you use, you'd need to know the coefficient. I've edited my answer to reflect where I think your misunderstanding with the method you attempted is coming from. The most accurate and recommended way of finding the coefficient would be by a careful, controlled experiment since no two surfaces (and therefore coefficients) are exactly alike. However, looking up values will provide a reasonable degree of accuracy depending on your needs. | |
| Jul 18, 2017 at 15:52 | history | edited | ERK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 502 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2017 at 15:16 | comment | added | Hendricks | This is very well explained. Straight to the point. Thanks! Correct me if I'm wrong: when going through the sum of torques instead, the only way to calculate the required torque is to know the static friction coefficient, right? I would have to determine the coefficient through experimentation or look up tables and find the situation that I want. Which path do you think (sum of forces or sum of torques) would then yield more accurate results? | |
| Jul 18, 2017 at 14:56 | history | edited | ERK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2017 at 13:20 | history | edited | ERK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 709 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2017 at 13:10 | history | edited | ERK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| Jul 18, 2017 at 13:03 | history | answered | ERK | CC BY-SA 3.0 |