Timeline for First class and second class constraints
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 7, 2012 at 0:16 | history | suggested | Alex Nelson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed TeX problems...although \{..\} should be used for the sets >:(
|
| Oct 6, 2012 at 23:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 7, 2012 at 0:16 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2012 at 16:49 | comment | added | Diego Mazón | @aries0152 What don't you understand? I think this answer is correct, clear and complete. | |
| Aug 24, 2012 at 12:43 | vote | accept | aries0152 | ||
| Aug 24, 2012 at 12:43 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2012 at 17:11 | history | edited | user10001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 18:38 | history | edited | user10001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 18:33 | comment | added | user10001 | Ya, you are right. Thanks for pointing it out, I'll correct it. | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 18:27 | comment | added | Diego Mazón | I think that the Poisson bracket between a first and a second class constraint is also a linear combination of constraints. You say that only PB between first class constraints is a linear combination of constraints. | |
| Aug 13, 2012 at 10:07 | history | edited | user10001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 9:59 | history | answered | user10001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |