Timeline for Is there a notion of torsion for Yang-Mills/gauge connection?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 13, 2017 at 0:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/874426685684408322 | ||
Jun 12, 2017 at 16:44 | answer | added | Bence Racskó | timeline score: 7 | |
Jun 12, 2017 at 10:34 | answer | added | Slereah | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:59 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 44 characters in body; edited tags
|
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:52 | comment | added | Kosm | Not sure how to define such a thing. Maybe $t-t^T$? A Yang-Mills generator $t$ minus its transpose. | |
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:45 | comment | added | PML | Please check this article: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07586. Since it is quite lengthy, use the search option of your browser for Yang-Mills. I don't know if it helps but they do talk about it. | |
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:28 | comment | added | phydev | @Dvij Yes, in Einsteinian GR that's the case. Thanks for pointing it out. Though I meant gravity theories, in general. Edited the question details now. | |
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:25 | history | edited | phydev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:13 | comment | added | user87745 | Just a remark: In general, in differential geometry (and in some theories of gravity trying to couple to fermions) torsion is allowed, but in GR, the connection is completely symmetric and torsion is zero. | |
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:05 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:06 | |||||
Jun 12, 2017 at 9:03 | history | asked | phydev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |