Timeline for Reversible vs Quasistatic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 at 8:39 | answer | added | Andrea Andrea | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 4, 2017 at 8:51 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 2, 2017 at 3:09 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 14:53 | comment | added | Chet Miller | Do you realize that there is a difference in context between the word "reversible" being applied to a process and the word "reversible" being applied to a chemical reaction? My Answer below focuses on reversible vs irreversible processes. | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 14:18 | comment | added | math_lover | @ChesterMiller : ok I edited my question | |
| Jun 4, 2017 at 14:18 | history | edited | math_lover | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed errors
|
| May 30, 2017 at 20:08 | answer | added | Chet Miller | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 30, 2017 at 10:16 | comment | added | valerio | physics.stackexchange.com/questions/297386/… | |
| May 30, 2017 at 4:43 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| May 30, 2017 at 0:38 | comment | added | Chet Miller | I'm confused. You said that the Gay-Lussac experiment is irreversible and not quasi-static, but then you cite it as a process that is reversible but not quasi-static. Am I interpreting what you said incorrectly? | |
| May 29, 2017 at 23:27 | answer | added | Christoph | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 29, 2017 at 23:16 | answer | added | Philip Wood | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 29, 2017 at 22:59 | answer | added | Elroch | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 29, 2017 at 22:43 | comment | added | Philip Wood | (1) "If I understand correctly, we say a process beginning at a state A(V0,P0,T0) and ending at a state B(V1,P1,T1) is reversible if there exists a process beginning at B and ending at A." That makes all processes beginning at A and ending at B reversible, doesn't it? (2) Surely you yourself have said that the Gay Lussac experiment is both irreversible and not quasi static. Sorry if these remarks seem like negative criticism, but you might like to amend your question or defend what you've written. | |
| May 29, 2017 at 22:32 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 29, 2017 at 22:24 | history | asked | math_lover | CC BY-SA 3.0 |