Timeline for Inconsistency in Lagrangian vs Hamiltonian formalism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 18, 2017 at 23:45 | vote | accept | donnydm | ||
May 18, 2017 at 13:21 | answer | added | J.G. | timeline score: 7 | |
May 18, 2017 at 13:11 | comment | added | lalala | Try to calculate $p_\eta$ ist zero.So you cannot express the velocity in terms of the momenta. This is called a constraint system. Dirac wrote a small book how to deal with that (since Electrodynamics is also a constraint system this is relevant for physics) | |
May 18, 2017 at 13:10 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
May 18, 2017 at 13:08 | comment | added | JamalS | Off the top of my head, note that as you computed, $\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot \eta} = 0$ and so $p_\eta = 0$. As such, $H$ cannot be written as some unique function of $p_\eta$ in any sense, and I don't think that $\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\eta}$ would be well-defined. | |
May 18, 2017 at 13:08 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Hints: 1. For starters, there is a primary constraint $p_{\eta}\approx 0$. 2. I discuss this example in my Phys.SE answer here. | |
May 18, 2017 at 13:01 | history | asked | donnydm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |