Timeline for Problem in de-broglie relation!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2018 at 16:44 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 15, 2017 at 11:46 | comment | added | anna v | You are extending some mathematical predictive successes, and Dirac's equation of modelling antiparticles, by giving the same power to all mathematical models. It is necessary to have a mathematical model in order to describe and predict natural phenomena, but it is not sufficient, is all I am saying with a counter example. | |
| May 15, 2017 at 11:27 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @annav I wasn't talking about the virtual particles... I was talking about anti-particles... Negative energy solutions to Dirac equation | |
| May 15, 2017 at 4:45 | comment | added | anna v | " Isn't there any interpretation" what other than mathematical? when you make a wave packet with group velocity c, which is a kind of weighted average, some parts will have higher than c | |
| May 15, 2017 at 4:43 | comment | added | anna v | There you are wrong. Virtual particles are a mathematical concept, and not measurable except through the mathematical effects they have in the calculations. | |
| May 15, 2017 at 4:19 | answer | added | anna v | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 15, 2017 at 4:08 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @annav No mathematics is ever nothing... Like... The negative solutions of Dirac equation was interpreted as antimatter... Likewise... Isn't there any interpretation for the superluminal phase speed? | |
| May 15, 2017 at 4:03 | comment | added | anna v | It is the mathematics of quantum mechanics too. It is not measurable, no signal can be sent faster than the group velocity. | |
| May 15, 2017 at 3:52 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @annav I get the point they are basically pointing to... But my question is something else... What is the significance of the superluminal speed of the wave ( the phase velocity) ? | |
| May 15, 2017 at 3:47 | comment | added | anna v | see answer here physics.stackexchange.com/questions/16063/… | |
| May 15, 2017 at 2:47 | history | edited | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Language, remove irrelevance
|
| May 15, 2017 at 2:11 | history | edited | Yuzuriha Inori |
edited tags
|
|
| May 13, 2017 at 15:22 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @ Ofek Gillon It's okay... Now if you could help with the bigger picture... It will be a big help! | |
| May 13, 2017 at 15:18 | comment | added | Ofek Gillon | Sorry, I proved it now to myself, this is correct. I thought you meant something else, my bad! | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:56 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @Ofek Gillon Would you mind to elaborate on your point a little... As you are debunking the basic formula of special relativity! | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:55 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @Shashaank That's the thing... Then why does calculations suggest otherwise? | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:53 | comment | added | Ofek Gillon | $E v_p \neq pc^2 $ | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:53 | comment | added | Shashaank | De Broglie wave travel with a group velocity which is less than c | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:45 | comment | added | user126422 | I erased it, that was correct. I believe the issue is that both $v_w=c$ and $v_p=c$ in vacuum | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:39 | comment | added | Yuzuriha Inori | @Willy Billy Williams Care to explain why? | |
| May 13, 2017 at 14:20 | history | edited | Yuzuriha Inori |
edited tags
|
|
| May 13, 2017 at 14:14 | history | asked | Yuzuriha Inori | CC BY-SA 3.0 |