Timeline for Reflectance vs. Thin Metal film Thickness Graph
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 28, 2012 at 23:07 | vote | accept | Syed Samiul Elahi | ||
| Jul 28, 2012 at 23:07 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2012 at 21:04 | comment | added | Syed Samiul Elahi | FYI. I actually used e^(-αx) for transmittance. | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 20:57 | comment | added | Syed Samiul Elahi | Thanks sir for your prompt reply. I am concerned of is what you suggested me to do, I actually did this to find absorption because I thought absorption would be equal to 1-transmittance. What gave me confidence to pursue my calculations are the following: Transmittance, T= Output intensity/initial intensity. And, absorption, A=(initial intensity-output intensity)/(initial intensity). After simplifying the equation, one should get A= 1-T. This is what is confusing me a lot. It would be much better if I could find an equation of transmittance that takes into account the absorption. | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 17:33 | history | answered | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |