Timeline for Perturbative Results Kitaev Model with Magnetic Field
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 16, 2023 at 7:48 | comment | added | Ogawa Chen | just one more thing, should there be a combinational factor $3! = 6$ before? | |
Sep 14, 2023 at 13:22 | comment | added | Ogawa Chen | I am a bit confused because you said "Kitaev mentioned in his paper that $\Delta E = u_0 J \approx 0.27 |J|$ (i.e.$ u_0 \approx 0.27$)", I think here the $J$ should be the one used in Kitaev's convention? In other words, the energy difference should be $0.27 |J|/4$ in terms of your convention. | |
Sep 14, 2023 at 13:09 | comment | added | Everett You | @OgawaChen I was using the spin operator convention. | |
Sep 13, 2023 at 11:18 | comment | added | Ogawa Chen | I just wonder in your expression for $\kappa$, for the parameter $J$, is it the one the same as in your starting Hamiltonian or is it the one used by Kitaev? because in Kitaev's paper, he wrote everything in terms of Pauli operators instead of spin operators, i.e., there can be a factor of 4 difference. | |
Apr 16, 2017 at 20:09 | vote | accept | Faser | ||
Apr 16, 2017 at 20:09 | history | bounty ended | Faser | ||
Apr 16, 2017 at 6:10 | history | edited | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Apr 16, 2017 at 5:57 | history | edited | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Apr 15, 2017 at 22:28 | history | edited | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 184 characters in body
|
Apr 15, 2017 at 22:12 | history | edited | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3581 characters in body
|
Apr 15, 2017 at 22:04 | history | edited | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3581 characters in body
|
Apr 15, 2017 at 21:24 | history | edited | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3581 characters in body
|
Apr 15, 2017 at 20:03 | history | answered | Everett You | CC BY-SA 3.0 |