Timeline for Active Matter Systems
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2017 at 6:12 | answer | added | surajshankar | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 5:24 | history | edited | Yashas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2017 at 4:34 | history | edited | Joe |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 8, 2017 at 17:15 | comment | added | user126422 | I do not believe you can write a hamiltonian, because there are hidden variables inside each agent that regulate their behaviour. The ergodicity assumption would also be violated | |
| Apr 8, 2017 at 9:35 | comment | added | Joe |
@Hugh Mungus Yes you are correct, but it doesn't answer the doubt.
|
|
| Apr 7, 2017 at 19:52 | comment | added | user126422 | The issue is not that they interact, in an ideal gas the particles do interact (they collide and exchange energy). In an active system the individual agents require an energy source to behave and interact in the way they do | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 19:10 | comment | added | garyp | In a statistical ensemble the members are not real systems. They are theoretical entities, each of which might be the state of a real system. An ensemble is not a collection of systems. In particular, in an active system, as I understand it, the agents interact. The notion of members of an ensemble interacting has no meaning. | |
| Apr 7, 2017 at 17:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 7, 2017 at 19:26 | |||||
| Apr 7, 2017 at 17:55 | history | asked | Joe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |