Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 13, 2022 at 13:01 comment added tryingtobeastoic (...) This concept of a photon being a wave, is why we believe it has to have the same speed in a vacuum. The simple answer is that we don't really know why they all travel at the same speed. All we know is that this is a characteristic of a wave form of energy. Just like mass is a characteristic of a particle. It just is. (Comment by @RobertRohe)
Jul 13, 2022 at 13:00 comment added tryingtobeastoic (...) Now if we introduce matter. This causes the particle's speed or trajectory, or both to be altered. Altering the speed will change it's wavelength. Altering it's trajectory will cause it's wavelength to go to zero in that direction. In both instances, energy is transferred and released, which gives rise to the idea that a photon is a particle. But at the same time, once it is free to travel uninhibited again in a vacuum, it reverts back to it's same wavelength and speed, which is characteristic of a pure wave.(...)
Jul 13, 2022 at 13:00 comment added tryingtobeastoic (...) Only a particles energy or frequency is constant. This dictates that speed and wavelength can change. With that established. Let's look at the scenario of photons traveling through a vacuum. In a vacuum, there is nothing to disrupt the speed. If the speed is constant and we have already established the frequency is constant, then the wavelength of that particle is also a constant.(...)
Jul 13, 2022 at 12:58 comment added tryingtobeastoic (...) A rollercoaster track example shows the wavelength constant. If a rollercoaster slows down, it still requires it to move through the same path to get to the next crest. It'll take more time to get there, but the wave is still the same shape and distance. But in order for this to work, it's frequency or energy decreases. in the wave particle world, this doesn't happen. Therefore, the rollercoaster example shows us the wavelength as a constant only for theoretical purposes, but doesn't work in the natural wave particle world.(...)
Jul 13, 2022 at 12:57 comment added tryingtobeastoic Not true. Bad analogy. First, in your last sentence you're using frequency and wavelength synonymously, which they're not. Frequency is the (oscillation rate) in a photon particle. Like the waving of the stick, it's frequency is constant. But wavelength is a measure of frequency within the constraints of speed. If frequency is a constant, and speed changes, then the wavelength must change. So, frequency isn't affected by speed, but wavelength is. The stick example shows the frequency constant, but not wavelength.(...)
Sep 10, 2019 at 15:52 review Suggested edits
Sep 10, 2019 at 17:00
Mar 28, 2017 at 20:03 history answered BetterBuildings CC BY-SA 3.0