Timeline for Numerical simulation of the double-slit experiment including watching the electrons
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 13, 2021 at 17:11 | history | edited | deechitpoudel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
Oct 13, 2021 at 15:22 | history | edited | deechitpoudel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:43 | history | undeleted | deechitpoudel | ||
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:42 | history | deleted | deechitpoudel | via Vote | |
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:42 | history | undeleted | deechitpoudel | ||
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:38 | history | deleted | deechitpoudel | via Vote | |
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:33 | history | edited | deechitpoudel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 169 characters in body
|
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:31 | history | undeleted | deechitpoudel | ||
Oct 13, 2021 at 14:31 | history | deleted | deechitpoudel | via Vote | |
Sep 6, 2021 at 18:22 | history | edited | deechitpoudel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 172 characters in body
|
Mar 22, 2017 at 16:30 | comment | added | anna v | It was a gross analogy, the cat used as an elaborate detector instead of a geiger counter, to plot the probability of decay, which would need many boxes with cats. In any case quantum mechanics has been clarified since S. times, and he is not a pope. Superposition is for the wavefunction, not for the measured particle which needs the square. | |
Mar 22, 2017 at 11:45 | comment | added | anna v | The wavefunction squared xx* is a probability distribution, not a prediction of a single measurement, but an accumulation of measurements. A single electron has a probability of going through one or the other. No one has seen an electron spread over space, as it is a point particle, even experimentally to a high accuracy. | |
Mar 22, 2017 at 6:36 | review | Late answers | |||
Mar 22, 2017 at 6:42 | |||||
Mar 22, 2017 at 6:19 | history | answered | deechitpoudel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |