Timeline for Physical interpretation of 2-forms dual to pseudovectors
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2020 at 17:46 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | @Peter4075 $L = \vec r \wedge \vec p$ was a bad choice of notation on my part. What I really meant was to take the wedge of the duals of the vector fields $\vec r(\vec r)$ and $\vec p(\vec r)$ (i.e. $x\mathrm{d}x + y \mathrm{d}y + z \mathrm{d}z$ and $p_x \mathrm{d}x + p_y \mathrm{d}y + p_z \mathrm{d}z$). | |
| Feb 3, 2020 at 8:47 | comment | added | Peter4075 | Naive question, but how can the exterior product of two vectors $L=\vec{r}\wedge\vec{p}$ be a 2-form? I thought a 2-form had to contains things like (in Cartesian coordinates) $dy\wedge dz$, $dz\wedge dx$ and $dx\wedge dy$. | |
| Apr 3, 2019 at 14:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 3, 2019 at 15:10 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 20, 2017 at 3:10 | vote | accept | Akerai | ||
| Feb 19, 2017 at 0:47 | history | answered | ACuriousMind♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |