Timeline for Why is sky on Mars red?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 12, 2018 at 15:01 | comment | added | Errol Hunt | Hi Ruslan. I got that from here: blog.briankoberlein.com/two-worlds-one-sun/My interpretation is this drives blue sunsets/sunrises, while it's the dust that drives red skies. | |
Aug 11, 2018 at 11:04 | comment | added | Ruslan | Where did you take that Mie mechanism results in preferential scattering of redder light? It's actually very non-uniform: see e.g. this image. And if you average over a range of size parameters, you'll get white scattered light (look outside at the clouds in the day time). | |
Feb 21, 2017 at 13:20 | comment | added | Jokela | I didn't wrote my answer "just for the bounty", so don't bother. I Just thank you for a very good question. And even for this "mainstream" answer, which is a very good approach too. Yet I think it should be tested in the lab, if this dust can cause any observable redness. I doubt it can, but then my doubts are nothing, and experiments/true observations are everything. | |
Feb 21, 2017 at 0:01 | comment | added | Errol Hunt | So, is it the done thing to tick my own (Eriita's) answer as the best answer? Or is that a little too self congratulatory? I assume I can't claim my own bounty! | |
Feb 15, 2017 at 22:35 | comment | added | Errol Hunt | Totally agree Ruslan. And plain English even better. Edited. | |
Feb 15, 2017 at 22:34 | history | edited | Errol Hunt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
Feb 15, 2017 at 15:24 | comment | added | Ruslan | $\propto^{-1}$ seems to not really be a common notation for inverse proportionality. Wouldn't it be better to simply say $\propto \lambda^{-4}$ instead? | |
Feb 15, 2017 at 6:04 | history | answered | Errol Hunt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |