Timeline for Integral spin and half integral spin
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2017 at 17:12 | vote | accept | Dragon123 | ||
| Feb 5, 2017 at 13:08 | comment | added | ZeroTheHero | @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance If you find where in FL this argument is made please let me know. I think it's a bit of a sloppy argument - doesn't work for fundamental bosons v.g. photons - and I can't imagine Landau didn't know that, so I'm surprised to hear he would even mention this line of reasoning... but hey... if Landau and Feynman "pushed" this, who am I to be critical. | |
| Feb 5, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | ZeroTheHero | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Feb 5, 2017 at 9:04 | comment | added | Selene Routley | IIRC The Feynman Lectures make a similar argument, although he wouldn't have used the argument of your first paragraph in that text. Now that I come to think of it, he may have just asserted that "spins add" as an assumption - I'll have to dig the relevant bits out now. | |
| Feb 5, 2017 at 7:21 | history | edited | ZeroTheHero | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Feb 4, 2017 at 22:32 | history | answered | ZeroTheHero | CC BY-SA 3.0 |