Timeline for Is the magnetic field of a moving electron caused by length contraction in the direction of motion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2021 at 21:16 | history | undeleted | rob♦ | ||
| Oct 4, 2021 at 20:36 | history | deleted | ceillac | via Vote | |
| Jan 24, 2017 at 15:15 | comment | added | ceillac | again en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Jan 24, 2017 at 13:36 | comment | added | Deschele Schilder | @borilla-Can't the E-field of a moving charge, relative to us, be expressed in the E-field of a charge nót moving relative to us we, without reference to a B-field? | |
| Jan 23, 2017 at 14:31 | comment | added | ceillac | not at all. It is the advantage of the tensor form: compact and simple. Follow the link or do it for yourself. I just had 2 lines in my answer to show the computation you have to do: only two matrix multiplications and you get the new electromagnetic field! | |
| Jan 23, 2017 at 14:26 | history | edited | ceillac | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 172 characters in body
|
| Jan 23, 2017 at 13:00 | comment | added | Deschele Schilder | @borilla-Is this not a bit circular? After all, in $ F^{\mu\nu} $, B is already included. | |
| Jan 20, 2017 at 12:04 | history | edited | ceillac | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 60 characters in body
|
| Jan 20, 2017 at 11:58 | history | answered | ceillac | CC BY-SA 3.0 |