Timeline for Relative clock speeds of two satellites with same but opposite direction orbits
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2022 at 10:10 | answer | added | Professor Sushing | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 20, 2022 at 17:09 | answer | added | fishinear | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 15, 2021 at 3:59 | answer | added | stuffu | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 13, 2021 at 19:30 | answer | added | kashyap vasavada | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 22, 2018 at 11:43 | answer | added | Zexxon | timeline score: -5 | |
| May 30, 2017 at 21:42 | answer | added | WillO | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 30, 2017 at 20:51 | answer | added | user157703 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 28, 2016 at 8:46 | comment | added | user130529 | BTW, would you have the same problem with the simplified (and meaningless) variant of the twin paradox where the twins start both flying in opposite directions, both decelerate, change direction and come back home (all this done symmetrically), where they observe ... that nothing has happened, they are still exactly the same age? | |
| Dec 28, 2016 at 8:08 | comment | added | user130529 | yes, why not adding your scheme, and telling what is the point that you do not understand? As it is, I don't understand exactly what you do not understand (as far as you said that you perfectly understand the symmetry of Lorentz equations, which is all it seems about). | |
| Dec 27, 2016 at 22:50 | comment | added | Cheers and hth. - Alf | @claudechuber: It's an incorrect understanding that this question presupposes one conclusion. I wouldn't have asked it if I had a ready conclusion. I think you're wrong that the question could be more precise, but by adding the description of a measurement scheme, which doesn't change the physics, I realized that it could be way more clear in the sense of not leaving so much room for hand-waiving in answers. ;-) Unfortunately, with less room for imagined unspecified effects, the current answers look less satisfying to me. :( | |
| Dec 27, 2016 at 18:19 | comment | added | user130529 | If the paths are different, why are you surprised that the ticks are not synchronized? Did you try sketching a space-time graphic similar to the one I linked in a comment below? Maybe your question would benefit being rephrased more precisely. | |
| Dec 27, 2016 at 7:05 | history | edited | Cheers and hth. - Alf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 365 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2016 at 6:50 | history | edited | Cheers and hth. - Alf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added addendum describing a clock tick communications scheme.
|
| S Dec 27, 2016 at 5:27 | history | suggested | magma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added twin-paradox tag
|
| Dec 27, 2016 at 1:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 27, 2016 at 5:27 | |||||
| Dec 27, 2016 at 1:11 | answer | added | magma | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 21:33 | answer | added | rob♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 11:35 | answer | added | user130529 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 8:35 | history | asked | Cheers and hth. - Alf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |