Skip to main content

Timeline for Naked eye cosmology?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 4, 2020 at 16:03 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Dec 22, 2016 at 9:41 vote accept Peter4075
Dec 19, 2016 at 15:16 history edited user139561 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Dec 19, 2016 at 15:14 comment added user139561 Sorry Peter, it actually made me think more about your (very good) question and add two more effects that I only thought of afterwards. So thanks :).
Dec 19, 2016 at 15:03 comment added Peter4075 Sorry, I've now done that.
Dec 19, 2016 at 14:54 history edited user139561 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2003 characters in body
Dec 19, 2016 at 14:47 history edited user139561 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2003 characters in body
Dec 19, 2016 at 12:05 comment added Peter4075 I've amended the question to include this comment.
Dec 19, 2016 at 11:57 comment added Peter4075 Can we infer the existence of dark matter from naked-eye observations? Is it reasonable to say that we can in the sense of if there were no dark matter we wouldn't be here to look at the sky in the first place? Are there any naked-eye clues to the expansion of the universe and dark matter? Would the sky look very different if there were no black holes?
Dec 18, 2016 at 20:12 comment added ProfRob I was going to write an answer that said that naked eye astronomy is misleading, because it appears to violate the cosmological principle. Even if you exclude the Milky Way, stars brighter than 6th mag are not isotropic.
Dec 18, 2016 at 17:47 history edited user139561 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 443 characters in body
Dec 18, 2016 at 17:28 comment added user107153 I think that, based on naked-eye observations only, you might come to the conclusion that the universe was very far from isotropic & homogeneous, because you might work out that the milky way was made of stars, and draw wrong conclusions from that.
Dec 18, 2016 at 14:18 history answered user139561 CC BY-SA 3.0