Timeline for Is normal-ordering useful in supersymmetric theories?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2019 at 14:56 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | @Qmechanic Yes. In the math terminology, tadpole = loop. | |
| Nov 10, 2019 at 14:29 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Is your definition of tadpole diagrams the same as self-loop diagrams? | |
| S Aug 20, 2017 at 15:57 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 20, 2017 at 15:57 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 18, 2017 at 12:15 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | @Neuneck yes. Note that such a diagram is momentum-independent so it can be entirely reabsorbed into the mass counter-term, so it is essentially irrelevant. | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 12:13 | comment | added | Neuneck | Your "Tadpole" definition also excludes the one-loop correction to the $\phi^4$-Theory. Is that intended? | |
| S Aug 12, 2017 at 14:20 | history | bounty started | AccidentalFourierTransform | ||
| S Aug 12, 2017 at 14:20 | history | notice added | AccidentalFourierTransform | Draw attention | |
| Aug 12, 2017 at 14:16 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | note 2: perhaps Apparent failure of SUSY nonrenormalization theorem might be related? | |
| Aug 12, 2017 at 14:13 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | note: I am using tadpole in its generalised sense: "... diagrams with a propagator that connects back to its originating vertex are often also referred as tadpoles." | |
| Aug 11, 2017 at 8:52 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/895930992275456000 | ||
| Feb 28, 2017 at 14:31 | history | edited | AccidentalFourierTransform | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Dec 5, 2016 at 17:56 | history | asked | AccidentalFourierTransform | CC BY-SA 3.0 |