Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 6, 2016 at 19:35 history edited Ilja CC BY-SA 3.0
improved the opening, to motivate the answer
Nov 2, 2016 at 17:54 comment added Ilja In practice there are three types of detectors for colours, three chemical substances in the eye. To compute, what signal they measure, take the incoming spectrum, multiply it with the corresponding sensitivity: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/… and take the integral. The curve would be different in respect to the frequency, and you would have to know the incoming distribution of frequencies; but the choice - frequency or wavelength - is not a property of the detector, only of your method of computation.
Nov 2, 2016 at 17:52 comment added Ilja White is meningfully defined only relative to a very specific detector: the human eye+brain :) the question whether a detector reacts to $\lambda$ or to $\omega$ is also misleading.
Nov 2, 2016 at 17:43 history edited Ilja CC BY-SA 3.0
added summary at the end
Nov 2, 2016 at 15:18 comment added Cham Does this tend to confirm that a complex detector could be reacting to frequencies, and not to wavelengths, and that there are also detectors that reacts to wavelength instead of frequencies ? And that "white" is thus defined relative to a particular detector ?
Nov 2, 2016 at 15:10 history answered Ilja CC BY-SA 3.0