Timeline for Won't Hawking radiation be sucked back into the black hole?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2016 at 13:40 | comment | added | Spoilt Milk | @Harsha why would light escape the black hole if emitted outside it? Won't it still be in its field and sucked into it? | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 12:02 | comment | added | Harsha | @Naveel If light is emitted in a direction away from the black hole when it is outside the event horizon, it will escape the black hole (but it will get redshifted by a lot), this is what I meant to say. Not sure if it answers your question though | |
| Oct 27, 2016 at 3:28 | history | edited | Spoilt Milk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added text to conclusion
|
| Oct 27, 2016 at 3:26 | comment | added | Spoilt Milk | @Harsha yes I am aware of that but my very problem is that statement of H.radiation is emitted from outside the event horizon. If this is so why won't the black hole suck back the radiation emitted? It is well within the vicinity of the BH. This brings another question: if Hawking radiation is not sucked by the BH does that mean that information-less systems are not affected by a BH? | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 20:19 | comment | added | Harsha | Do note that Hawking radiation is emitted from outside the event horizon; hence, some of the radiation will be able to escape. | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 17:26 | history | edited | Spoilt Milk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 16:22 | answer | added | Bob Bee | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 26, 2016 at 15:30 | history | asked | Spoilt Milk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |