Skip to main content

Timeline for Is space infinitely divisible?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 25, 2013 at 14:23 answer added Jim timeline score: 7
Jul 25, 2013 at 7:36 comment added Qmechanic Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/9720/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/35674/2451 , and links therein. Also related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/64197/2451
Jul 25, 2013 at 7:31 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 69 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Jul 25, 2013 at 7:29 history protected Qmechanic
Jul 25, 2013 at 4:35 answer added aquagremlin timeline score: 0
May 13, 2012 at 21:35 comment added Josh MacKay Thanks for your feedback. I apologize for my rambling question. What I am really asking is if infinity were to not exist in reality could we then conclude that space must be comprised of finite bits and what would be consequences if this were the case.
May 13, 2012 at 19:52 comment added David Z Hi Josh, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! Since you've written so much, it's hard to see the essence of what you're really asking without looking at the title. Could you try to edit the question down to be more easily readable by eliminating some of the less important details?
May 13, 2012 at 16:41 comment added Zo the Relativist The best counterargument is that there is no evidence of a smallest possible distance. There are some theories that postulate fundamental length scales (LQG, for instance, quantizes areas at a fundamental length scale), but, as yet, there is no reason to believe any of this. On the other hand, the mathematics of differential differentials and contiuous functions is much, much cleaner than finitary matheamatics of systems with a large N. It's simiply easier to talk about the continuous interval (0,1) than it is to talk about $10^{34}$ discrete subintervals.
May 13, 2012 at 14:49 answer added Arnold Neumaier timeline score: 5
May 13, 2012 at 14:26 history asked Josh MacKay CC BY-SA 3.0