Timeline for Why are particles thought of as irreducible representations, in plain English?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2020 at 20:30 | history | edited | Ruslan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Sep 8, 2016 at 6:32 | vote | accept | Dac0 | ||
| Sep 3, 2016 at 14:18 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Other possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/65839/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/224812/2451 and links therein. | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 14:17 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Sep 3, 2016 at 13:04 | answer | added | Valter Moretti | timeline score: 59 | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 10:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 3, 2016 at 10:20 | |||||
| Sep 3, 2016 at 10:16 | comment | added | lemon | Possible duplicate: Why do we say that irreducible representation of Poincare group represents the one-particle state? | |
| Sep 3, 2016 at 10:13 | history | asked | Dac0 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |