Timeline for Why image is blurry or focused with convex lenses?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2016 at 6:34 | vote | accept | The Capacitor | ||
| Aug 29, 2016 at 11:31 | |||||
| Aug 25, 2016 at 5:37 | vote | accept | The Capacitor | ||
| Aug 25, 2016 at 6:34 | |||||
| Aug 24, 2016 at 13:30 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | Ivan - you should try it. Get a pencil, a magnifying glass, a piece of tissue paper and some blu-tack to hold them in place. Shine a light on the pencil and you will see an image on the tissue paper - now move the paper forwards and backwards. You will actually see the blurring happen.. | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 7:29 | comment | added | The Capacitor | Of course, I get that. I'm trying to understand it at the lowest level possible. | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 6:16 | history | edited | Rory Alsop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 209 characters in body
|
| Aug 24, 2016 at 6:12 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | There are not 3 or 5 lines. That is just a diagram. Really there are infinitely many "rays" of light | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 4:02 | comment | added | The Capacitor | Why not 3 or 5 place? | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 20:01 | history | edited | Rory Alsop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 78 characters in body
|
| Aug 23, 2016 at 20:00 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | Ivan - what do you mean? Your comment on his post still makes no sense. It's the same thing you said in your point 4. It's not 3 or 5 places - it's smeared between them | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 19:17 | comment | added | The Capacitor | Please look at M .Enns's response comment | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 17:27 | history | answered | Rory Alsop | CC BY-SA 3.0 |