Skip to main content
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
user108787
user108787

You need to convince yourself that the 1st two (always was / all just happened) are utterly untenable in any reality that makes sense (and all those that don't as well). If you cannot conclude this then accept one or other (or both) and be happy - there's nothing to explain, move along, these are in fact the ones you want. There are many people who do seem able to do this - including the great RichardLawrence Krauss - more of him below. I do not find the arguments intellectually tenable (of the ones I understand or think I understand) and I hope to understand more of them. But I'd be surprised if anything changed (KrausKrauss nothwithstanding). That's NOT a 'religious observation' but it does lead to a 'metaphysical' conclusion.

You need to convince yourself that the 1st two (always was / all just happened) are utterly untenable in any reality that makes sense (and all those that don't as well). If you cannot conclude this then accept one or other (or both) and be happy - there's nothing to explain, move along, these are in fact the ones you want. There are many people who do seem able to do this - including the great Richard Krauss - more of him below. I do not find the arguments intellectually tenable (of the ones I understand or think I understand) and I hope to understand more of them. But I'd be surprised if anything changed (Kraus nothwithstanding). That's NOT a 'religious observation' but it does lead to a 'metaphysical' conclusion.

You need to convince yourself that the 1st two (always was / all just happened) are utterly untenable in any reality that makes sense (and all those that don't as well). If you cannot conclude this then accept one or other (or both) and be happy - there's nothing to explain, move along, these are in fact the ones you want. There are many people who do seem able to do this - including the great Lawrence Krauss - more of him below. I do not find the arguments intellectually tenable (of the ones I understand or think I understand) and I hope to understand more of them. But I'd be surprised if anything changed (Krauss nothwithstanding). That's NOT a 'religious observation' but it does lead to a 'metaphysical' conclusion.

deleted 50 characters in body
Source Link

Nice little dig in passing about certain model based theories at around 5-6m (some laughed). http://physics.stackexchange.com/posts/275959/edit

Nice little dig in passing about certain model based theories at around 5-6m (some laughed). http://physics.stackexchange.com/posts/275959/edit

Nice little dig in passing about certain model based theories at around 5-6m (some laughed).

added 4571 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading