Timeline for Rewriting bosonic action in Altland and Simon Chapter 4
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2019 at 3:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 4, 2019 at 5:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 29, 2019 at 3:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 24, 2017 at 19:34 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 24, 2017 at 16:06 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Apr 24, 2017 at 14:54 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Apr 24, 2017 at 14:28 | answer | added | Hui Yang | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 5:47 | comment | added | JNL | Thanks Dimitri, I think it is that. The Hamiltonian above is in imaginary time hence the minus sign. However, I still don't understand how to obtain the last term in the action $2i\partial_\tau \theta\pi_\theta$, unless there is the typo in the text. | |
| Aug 30, 2016 at 9:49 | comment | added | Dimitri | Looks to me like the first action you wrote deals with imaginary time, while Hamiltonian formalism uses real-time, hence the minus sign. | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 9:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 23, 2016 at 9:42 | |||||
| Aug 23, 2016 at 9:40 | history | asked | JNL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |