Timeline for Geodesic deviation in Hawking radiation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2021 at 19:15 | comment | added | nabzdyczony | I can not open this Kuwabara's PDF file. Does anyone know if it is still available somewhere? | |
| Aug 20, 2016 at 19:39 | comment | added | faero | Nevertheless, as I understand it, the geodesic trick is useful in order to extract the evolution of the (late time) modes. | |
| Aug 20, 2016 at 19:08 | comment | added | Bob Bee | Understood. Really, it was calculated that way by Hawking also. It is not a model of classical particles following geodesics (though I'd like to see that also), but of quantum fields in the background, and what happens to the particle number as function of frequency. The quantum field model on the background GR field is on sort of firm ground. | |
| Aug 20, 2016 at 16:22 | vote | accept | faero | ||
| Aug 20, 2016 at 16:22 | comment | added | faero | I got this idea from the thesis of Kuwabara, thank you. I was hoping to find a more precise argument with something concerning congruence of geodesics, but I think that it is good enough. | |
| S Aug 20, 2016 at 13:30 | history | suggested | Chappo Hasn't Forgotten | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed spelling errors, added a couple of words that seemed to be omitted accidentally.
|
| Aug 20, 2016 at 12:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 20, 2016 at 13:30 | |||||
| Aug 20, 2016 at 2:37 | history | edited | Bob Bee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some on the QFT calculation and links to two re-do's of it, easier to follow.
|
| Aug 20, 2016 at 2:19 | history | edited | Bob Bee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some on the QFT calculation and links to two re-do's of it, easier to follow. More in a couple minutes
|
| Aug 19, 2016 at 21:55 | history | edited | Bob Bee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Aug 19, 2016 at 21:48 | comment | added | faero | Actually, I was just referring to his own calculation to understand the approximation ; my question was not on other methods to obtain the radiation. | |
| Aug 19, 2016 at 21:40 | history | answered | Bob Bee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |