Timeline for Hermitian adjoint of 4-gradient in Dirac equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2020 at 15:39 | answer | added | Souparna Nath | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 27, 2020 at 21:04 | answer | added | Anass Oualla | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 14, 2016 at 20:30 | vote | accept | connorp | ||
| Aug 14, 2016 at 17:32 | answer | added | Javier | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 14, 2016 at 16:42 | comment | added | connorp | @Javier Could you explain why exactly the derivative is unaffected? I'm not very familiar with spinor space. Thanks. | |
| Aug 14, 2016 at 10:48 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Aug 14, 2016 at 10:39 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 23:02 | comment | added | Javier | Depends on the space. If you're taking adjoints in $L^2$, then yes, it's anti-Hermitian. But here you're taking adjoints in spinor space (that is, transposing and conjugating spinors and matrices), so the derivative is unaffected. | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 22:42 | history | asked | connorp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |