Timeline for What if singularities are massless? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 11, 2016 at 0:42 | history | closed |
knzhou Prahar auden sammy gerbil Gert |
Needs details or clarity | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 21:53 | answer | added | Lawrence B. Crowell | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 19:16 | history | edited | Faraaz Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2016 at 19:14 | comment | added | Prahar | Singularities are not physical objects. | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 19:02 | review | Close votes | |||
Aug 11, 2016 at 0:42 | |||||
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:54 | answer | added | Zo the Relativist | timeline score: 4 | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:44 | comment | added | Alpha001 | Singularities can't really be described with our theory of gravitation. Physicists hope that there is an explanation if we know what quantum gravity means. So there should be some effect of this "quantum gravity" which cure our world. | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:42 | comment | added | Faraaz Ahmad | @count_to_10: we know mass can convert to energy, because this is how nuclei get their binding energy | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:39 | comment | added | lemon | Singularities aren't actual things that exist in the real world - they represent points at which our physical theories break down. So don't lose any sleep over them. | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:38 | comment | added | user108787 | No offense, but you have replaced one mystery (what's "inside" a black hole) with two mysteries: how would "infinite acceleration" occur and how would it covert mass into energy? | |
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:36 | history | edited | Faraaz Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2016 at 18:28 | history | asked | Faraaz Ahmad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |