Timeline for Is moment of inertia cumulative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2016 at 8:55 | vote | accept | JavaProphet | ||
| Aug 9, 2016 at 8:55 | vote | accept | JavaProphet | ||
| Aug 9, 2016 at 8:55 | |||||
| Aug 9, 2016 at 7:14 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Aug 9, 2016 at 6:50 | answer | added | Nimrod Morag | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 5:40 | comment | added | knzhou | Sure. As long as you're always taking the moment of inertia about the same point (the origin) it's still cumulative. | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 5:34 | comment | added | JavaProphet | @knzhou What if they were bound at any point(s), for example P and Q (not origin) | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 5:33 | comment | added | knzhou | Yes. $\hspace{0mm}$ | |
| Aug 9, 2016 at 5:30 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 9, 2016 at 6:27 | |||||
| Aug 9, 2016 at 5:28 | history | asked | JavaProphet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |