Timeline for Physical interpretation of different selfadjoint extensions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2011 at 19:23 | comment | added | András Bátkai | Thank, I like both answers very much. The references are great. Unfortunately, I have to choose an answer to accept... | |
| Sep 16, 2011 at 11:35 | comment | added | user135 | @Urs Schreiber Thanks for the add. The topic was common folklore in Zaragoza in the nineties and it was not infrequent in PhD theses, but I think that its main role was motivational, either aiming towards other topics, or used as a guide when exploring some other concept. For instance, it was very valuable to me in order to navigate Albeverio et al, who had got into a confusing notation/naming for some self adjoint extensions classifying these "1D point interactions". | |
| Sep 16, 2011 at 11:14 | comment | added | Urs Schreiber | I hadn't been aware of the reference by Esteve. I have added it to the references of the nLab entry ncatlab.org/nlab/show/quantum+anomaly (many more references are currently still missing there, of course). | |
| Sep 16, 2011 at 10:54 | history | answered | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |