Skip to main content
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Suppose a hydrogen atom is excited up to a $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\uparrow]}$ state which takes about 1000 kJ/mol.

Due to electron shielding f orbitals tend to be higher energy than d orbitals which are higher than p orbitals which are higher than s orbitals. But in a hydrogen atom there is only one electron so the 2s and 2p orbitals are equivalent in energy.

So there's no difference in energy with $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\;]} \underset{2p}{[\uparrow \vert \; \vert \;]}$.

Now there are three different symmetrical p orbitals so I guess the end result would still be spherical. But would the radius of the excited hydrogen atom be an overall higher radius then one would typically expect?

I don't know how to square this with How big is an excited hydrogen atom?How big is an excited hydrogen atom? which seems to be mostly talking about general approximations for very highly excited states or the fine details of the Schrodinger equation which I don't really understand.

I also don't know if this applies to molecules. Are the 2p orbitals and 2s orbitals equivalent in energy when a hydrogen atom is bounded to another atom? Pi bonds are generally weaker than sigma bonds but I don't know how two equal energy sigma bonds would work.

Suppose a hydrogen atom is excited up to a $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\uparrow]}$ state which takes about 1000 kJ/mol.

Due to electron shielding f orbitals tend to be higher energy than d orbitals which are higher than p orbitals which are higher than s orbitals. But in a hydrogen atom there is only one electron so the 2s and 2p orbitals are equivalent in energy.

So there's no difference in energy with $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\;]} \underset{2p}{[\uparrow \vert \; \vert \;]}$.

Now there are three different symmetrical p orbitals so I guess the end result would still be spherical. But would the radius of the excited hydrogen atom be an overall higher radius then one would typically expect?

I don't know how to square this with How big is an excited hydrogen atom? which seems to be mostly talking about general approximations for very highly excited states or the fine details of the Schrodinger equation which I don't really understand.

I also don't know if this applies to molecules. Are the 2p orbitals and 2s orbitals equivalent in energy when a hydrogen atom is bounded to another atom? Pi bonds are generally weaker than sigma bonds but I don't know how two equal energy sigma bonds would work.

Suppose a hydrogen atom is excited up to a $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\uparrow]}$ state which takes about 1000 kJ/mol.

Due to electron shielding f orbitals tend to be higher energy than d orbitals which are higher than p orbitals which are higher than s orbitals. But in a hydrogen atom there is only one electron so the 2s and 2p orbitals are equivalent in energy.

So there's no difference in energy with $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\;]} \underset{2p}{[\uparrow \vert \; \vert \;]}$.

Now there are three different symmetrical p orbitals so I guess the end result would still be spherical. But would the radius of the excited hydrogen atom be an overall higher radius then one would typically expect?

I don't know how to square this with How big is an excited hydrogen atom? which seems to be mostly talking about general approximations for very highly excited states or the fine details of the Schrodinger equation which I don't really understand.

I also don't know if this applies to molecules. Are the 2p orbitals and 2s orbitals equivalent in energy when a hydrogen atom is bounded to another atom? Pi bonds are generally weaker than sigma bonds but I don't know how two equal energy sigma bonds would work.

edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
edited body
Source Link

Suppose a hydrogen atom is excited up to a $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\uparrow]}$ state which takes about 1000 kJ/mol.

Due to electron shielding f orbitals tend to be higher energy than d orbitals which are higher than p orbitals which are higher than s orbitals. But in a hydrogen atom there is only one electron so the 2s and 2p orbitals are equivalent in energy.

So there's no difference in energy with $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\;]} \underset{2p}{[\uparrow \vert \; \vert \;]}$.

Now there are three different symmetrical p orbitals so I thinkguess the end result mightwould still be spherical. But would the radius of the excited hydrogen atom be an overall higher radius then one would typically expect?

I don't know how to square this with How big is an excited hydrogen atom? which seems to be mostly talking about general approximations for very highly excited states or the fine details of the Schrodinger equation which I don't really understand.

I also don't know if this applies to molecules. Are the 2p orbitals and 2s orbitals equivalent in energy when a hydrogen atom is bounded to another atom? Pi bonds are generally weaker than sigma bonds but I don't know how two equal energy sigma bonds would work.

Suppose a hydrogen atom is excited up to a $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\uparrow]}$ state which takes about 1000 kJ/mol.

Due to electron shielding f orbitals tend to be higher energy than d orbitals which are higher than p orbitals which are higher than s orbitals. But in a hydrogen atom there is only one electron so the 2s and 2p orbitals are equivalent in energy.

So there's no difference in energy with $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\;]} \underset{2p}{[\uparrow \vert \; \vert \;]}$.

Now there are three different symmetrical p orbitals so I think the end result might still be spherical. But would the radius of the excited hydrogen atom be an overall higher radius then one would typically expect?

I don't know how to square this with How big is an excited hydrogen atom? which seems to be mostly talking about general approximations for very highly excited states or the fine details of the Schrodinger equation which I don't really understand.

I also don't know if this applies to molecules. Are the 2p orbitals and 2s orbitals equivalent in energy when a hydrogen atom is bounded to another atom?

Suppose a hydrogen atom is excited up to a $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\uparrow]}$ state which takes about 1000 kJ/mol.

Due to electron shielding f orbitals tend to be higher energy than d orbitals which are higher than p orbitals which are higher than s orbitals. But in a hydrogen atom there is only one electron so the 2s and 2p orbitals are equivalent in energy.

So there's no difference in energy with $\underset{1s}{[\;]} \underset{2s}{[\;]} \underset{2p}{[\uparrow \vert \; \vert \;]}$.

Now there are three different symmetrical p orbitals so I guess the end result would still be spherical. But would the radius of the excited hydrogen atom be an overall higher radius then one would typically expect?

I don't know how to square this with How big is an excited hydrogen atom? which seems to be mostly talking about general approximations for very highly excited states or the fine details of the Schrodinger equation which I don't really understand.

I also don't know if this applies to molecules. Are the 2p orbitals and 2s orbitals equivalent in energy when a hydrogen atom is bounded to another atom? Pi bonds are generally weaker than sigma bonds but I don't know how two equal energy sigma bonds would work.

Source Link
Loading