Skip to main content

Timeline for Unitarity of S-matrix in QFT

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 1, 2013 at 17:34 history edited Dilaton
edited tags
Jan 1, 2013 at 17:33 comment added Dilaton Thanks @Qmechanic, it never hurts when you hava a look at it too when I retag, since you are much much much more knowledgable. I change the tags as you suggest. And happy new year to you :-)
Jan 1, 2013 at 16:27 comment added Qmechanic Hi @Dilaton: Concerning the tag edit(v3) I would suggest the unitarity tag and the s-matrix-theory tag instead of the qed tag (because OP is really asking about qft) and the research-level tag (because the question is textbook material).
Jan 1, 2013 at 10:46 history edited Dilaton
edited tags
Jan 1, 2013 at 10:44 history edited Dilaton
edited tags
Mar 12, 2012 at 16:49 answer added Arnold Neumaier timeline score: 7
Mar 3, 2012 at 8:14 answer added Igor Khavkine timeline score: 5
Feb 26, 2012 at 18:56 comment added MKO @Sidious Lord: Can I read somewhere about such examples? Can it happen in QED? (As far as I heard, the 2d case is somewhat exceptional in QED: in the Schwinger model polarization of vacuum has an effect of creation of a bound state of electron-positron pair which is a free boson. But I might be wrong about this, I do not really know this.)
Feb 26, 2012 at 15:36 comment added Sidious Lord Why do you say that two particles can't form a bound state in QFT? I'm pretty sure there are two-dimensional integrable field theories with scattering $A+B \to C$ and where $A$, $B$ and $C$ are perfectly stable particle states.
Feb 26, 2012 at 11:07 answer added Vladimir Kalitvianski timeline score: 1
Feb 26, 2012 at 10:41 history asked MKO CC BY-SA 3.0