Timeline for relation between line width and life time
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 22, 2016 at 18:07 | vote | accept | anonymous | ||
| Jul 18, 2016 at 13:55 | history | edited | Selene Routley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2016 at 13:54 | comment | added | Selene Routley | @DanielSank It's a probability amplitude, the probability is not oscillatory. If you check out the answer I link, you'll see what it means. It is the amplitude to find a two state system coupled to the EM field in its excited state in the time interval $[t,\,t+d t)$. It sits together with a continuous function $\psi(\omega, t)$ that defines the amplitude to find the EM field mode in frequency interval $[\omega, \omega+d\omega)$ and together they define the quantum state of the whole coupled system. | |
| Jul 18, 2016 at 13:38 | comment | added | DanielSank | The $\omega$ in the equation is not defined. I doubt there should be an oscillatory term in the decay probability. | |
| Jul 18, 2016 at 13:27 | history | edited | Selene Routley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2016 at 0:48 | history | edited | Selene Routley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2016 at 0:12 | history | edited | Selene Routley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 714 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2016 at 0:06 | history | answered | Selene Routley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |