Timeline for Derivation of Hamilton's Third Relation. Where is the mistake?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 23:08 | comment | added | bolbteppa | @sammygerbil My god... | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:53 | history | edited | sammy gerbil |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:47 | comment | added | sammy gerbil | @Pulsar : This is not abuse. Questions which merely ask "Check my work" or "What am I doing wrong?" and are of no benefit to other users are off-topic according to the homework policy. Users are entitled and encouraged to use voting to uphold the standards and policies of the site. meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/714 | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:39 | comment | added | Pulsar | @ sammygerbil Please do not abuse the voting system to downvote legitimate questions. | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:39 | vote | accept | TheVal | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:36 | answer | added | Pulsar | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:30 | history | edited | TheVal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited format
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:27 | comment | added | TheVal | @sammygerbil In the end, I just wanted to see if somebody would help me to understant what is wrong with my derivation. So I don't think my question is worth a downvote for that. | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:26 | comment | added | TheVal | @sammygerbil Because, under the rules of SE, I showed an issue related to the context presented in the tags with showing my work done to clear my confusion. I looked this source, the Phillips, this source also and this last source, but the major part of textbooks don't include the third relation, because it is dependent of the first two | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:16 | comment | added | sammy gerbil | These relations are derived in textbooks and online resources. Why are you asking us to check your work instead of using available resources? Or asking your classmates? | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:07 | history | asked | TheVal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |