Timeline for Do pear-shaped nuclei really have anything to do with time travel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 5:09 | vote | accept | Matt | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 2:08 | answer | added | user4552 | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 20:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/750420011290943488 | ||
| Jul 5, 2016 at 17:58 | answer | added | Emilio Pisanty | timeline score: 66 | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 13:08 | vote | accept | Matt | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 5:09 | |||||
| Jul 5, 2016 at 11:13 | answer | added | John Rennie | timeline score: 33 | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 10:41 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | ... and as that link shows, the news coverage you link to seems definitely breathless to me. The paper that sparked that question, from 2013, already had experimental confirmation of the existence of pear-shaped nuclei, and it was widely reported (within science news) at the time. | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 10:35 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | Related: Why are pear-shaped nuclei possible?. | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 10:31 | history | edited | John Rennie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Update link
|
| Jul 5, 2016 at 10:30 | history | edited | David Z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
various formatting improvements
|
| Jul 5, 2016 at 10:21 | history | asked | Matt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |