Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 14, 2017 at 9:33 comment added Novice C This could be taken one step further by invoking the fundamental thermodynamic relationship. Then for a reversible process we have $\delta W_{\textrm{rev}} = -p \textrm{d} V + f \textrm{d} X$. It is clear in general that pdV work is path dependent from valerio92 example, and you would not call $\delta W$ a state function, as it depends wholly on the path. Just because something can be expressed in terms of it's initial and final state does not make it a state function, note you are only able to do so after assuming a path. This is the entire point of using $\delta W$ vs $\textrm{d}W$.
Jun 23, 2016 at 13:20 comment added valerio Actually for reversible isothermal and reversible isentropic it is a trivial result because you are choosing a single curve connecting the two points in the thermodynamic plane. It is a non-trivial result in the case of the irreversible adiabatic, because in that case it is impossible to draw a curve in the thermodynamic plane.
Jun 23, 2016 at 12:34 comment added valerio It is true for a reversible isothermal, general adiabatic ($\delta Q=0$) and reversible isentropic ($dS=0$) transformation. You could add those cases to your answer ;-)
Jun 23, 2016 at 11:35 history edited Dimitri CC BY-SA 3.0
added 55 characters in body
Jun 23, 2016 at 11:34 comment added Dimitri You're right, at least it seems rigorous for an isotherm but it probably is a more complicated question in the general case.
Jun 23, 2016 at 8:59 comment added Auburn Yes but Tds is path dependent.
Jun 22, 2016 at 13:01 comment added valerio *I meant isobar+isochor
Jun 22, 2016 at 12:48 comment added valerio This is only true if $T$ is constant, i.e. along an isotherm. For example, consider the reversible transformation of an ideal gas from point $A$ to point $B$ along an isotherm and then along an isobar.
Jun 22, 2016 at 12:11 history answered Dimitri CC BY-SA 3.0