Timeline for Why Does Renormalized Perturbation Theory Work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2016 at 6:14 | comment | added | Adam | @JLA: since the perturbation expansion in terms of $\lambda(\mu)$ is fine (for $p$ close to $\mu$), adding more terms won't change much. However, one can resums the logs, to improve the series, using RG like equations. | |
| Jun 14, 2016 at 3:34 | comment | added | JLA | Ok I'll continue reading about that. I guess maybe I am confused about how you know, when making a prediction to what order you should calculate the perturbation series, and if adding more terms makes the value of the truncated series significantly different. | |
| Jun 13, 2016 at 7:29 | history | edited | Adam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jun 13, 2016 at 6:41 | history | answered | Adam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |