Timeline for Problem with magnetic field due to relative motion
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2017 at 14:19 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 6, 2017 at 7:42 | answer | added | MaDrung | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 6, 2017 at 2:27 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 3, 2017 at 13:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 11, 2016 at 7:58 | comment | added | philip_0008 | You just found a great paradox in relativity, and a proof for multiple universes:). It might mean that the frame of reference as seen in B will diverge to another universe different from the universe of the frame observed in laboratory.. not sure though. I was also puzzled by this.. | |
| Jun 10, 2016 at 22:37 | comment | added | HolgerFiedler | Please note that even if a charge is in rest there is a magnetic field. This is because a electron as well as a proton have the intrinsic property of a magnetic dipole moment. | |
| Jun 10, 2016 at 18:38 | answer | added | ProfRob | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 10, 2016 at 17:38 | comment | added | M Barbosa | The moving charge will produce a changing electric field. Although it may not appear to move in the second frame, it will change in time, and from Ampere's law we know that a time-changing E-field requires a curling magnetic field to be present: | |
| Jun 10, 2016 at 17:12 | history | asked | Srikar Anand | CC BY-SA 3.0 |